A Web Site by W. F. O'Rourke
(This site last edited on July 7, 2003.)
Israel's population and area are roughly equal to the population and area of Alabama. Try to imagine what would happen if there were a fatal terrorist attack every day in Alabama or Mississippi or Maine or New Hampshire or Oregon.
The terrorist slaughter still goes on. So why would anyone would think that peace is at hand for Israel?
(Since something is always happening in the Middle East, immediately below this message are three news tickers which will let you know what's happening in that part of the world today. To read any story on the following news tickers, click on the headline.)
Below is a map of Israel. Notice that the West Bank is a huge area right in the middle of Israel. The occupied Gaza Strip in the south-west and the occupied Golan Heights in the north-east are smaller areas but are important strategically to Israel's enemies.
To return to this page from any link on this page, you have to use your browser's "Back" button.
Guide to Links
The Map of Israel
Useful Sites for Further Study of the Conflict
The Parable of the Scorpion and the Crocodile
The Parable of the Imaginary Oranges
The World. . .According to the CIA
Why You Should Worry about the Conflict
A Psychological Reason for the Conflict
Now Arafat Claims He Favors an Israeli State!!!
And (Get This!) Sharon Now Favors a Palestinian State!!!
How Israeli Election Politics Keeps the Pot Boiling
The Next Prime Minister of Israel
The Photo Gallery
Recent Editorial Cartoons
The Suicide Bombing Log Book
Mister O's Personal Opinion
The following remarks are an effort to make sense of the crazy conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians. What I have to say is neither pro-Israeli nor pro-Palestinian. To the best of my ability I have tried to keep the report factual. Some of the information comes from a book entitled "The Middle East for Complete Idiots," some comes a variety of internet resources. (See the list of links at the bottom of this page.) Some of the information comes from various Israeli and Arab students I have known over the years. And, of course, some of the information is taken from daily television and radio news reports. (Please notice that there are three different news tickers at the top of this page where you can get current news stories.)
At the top of this page is a map of Israel. A basic familiarity with the geography of the area is helpful; however, understanding the situation is not so easy because the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis is crazy! Rather than settle their differences and live in peace, the two sides continue to risk complete destruction and the rest of the world puzzles over why the violence continues.
In the area we today know as Israel the crazy enmity between Arab and Jew has been simmering for several thousand years. And that simmering pot has boiled over so many times in the past that it is no surprise to learn that Israeli troops and tanks are on the move again, that suicide bombers are blowing themselves up on Israeli buses and in Tel Aviv nightclubs, that American newspapers and magazines are chock full of stories about Arafat, Sharon, and the latest suicide bombing, and that American diplomats are once again trying to promote peace in the area by trying to stop the current fighting and trying to force the two sides to develop a long-range peace plan. Well, good luck to the diplomats! We hope they are successful, but we also know there are many reasons why no plan for peace is likely to end that conflict. Even as I was typing this on May 1, 2002, a gun battle between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian gunmen holed up in the Church of the Nativity had left that famous site in Bethlehem in flames, and when I was editing this site on May 8, 2002, the news was all about a suicide bomber who killed himself and 15 Israelis. Indeed, since the current wave of violence began in 2000, at least 1400 Palestinians and at least 700 Israelis have died as a direct result of all the terrorism and military action.
Yes, there are many reasons why it very nearly impossible to solve the problem of Israeli/Palestinian violence, but in these remarks I will concentrate on the only most important ones. Some of these reasons are religious; some of the reasons are historical; some of the reasons have to do with the personal attitudes of such leaders as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat; and some of the reasons have to do with future issues that will cause conflict between the two sides. The details of the struggle are enormously bewildering, but in the following paragraphs I will try to give you enough information to understand what is going on in the area and to understand why we should not be too quick to believe that there will ever be peace in that part of the world. As Christians we believe that all problems can be resolved by God, and it may be that we will have to trust God on this one; for as you will see below, even though individual Palestinians and Israelis object to the constant bloodshed and destruction, there are so many other obstacles to a human solution to this conflict that it is very close to impossible to see how a lasting peace can ever come to that region of the world.
So let's try to shed a little light on some of those reasons why bringing peace to that part of the world is apparently impossible. . .at least, nobody has yet succeeded over the past several thousand years and it seems unlikely that anyone will succeed in the near future. . .unless, of course, there is a Divine intervention. (Back to Text Guide)
To begin with some religious issues, it is important to understand that Palestinian Arabs and Israelis are like two rival heirs to Abraham's estate. That is, both sides claim to be descended from Abraham; and both sides believe they themselves are the "true" and "legal" descendants of Abraham. The Arabs are descended from Abraham through his first son, Ishmael the traditional figure alleged to have founded the Arab ethnic group. According to the Arab view of things, Abraham had officially named his first-born son Ishmael as heir to his estate. Therefore, the land that God promised to Abraham should have been inherited by Ishmael and his descendants. But the Jewish interpretation is quite different. Because the first-born son Ishmael was the son of a maidservant to whom Abraham was not married, the Jews view Abraham's second son Isaac as the legitimate heir to the promised land. In other words, the Jews feel that the true son of the true marriage of Abraham and Sara has the right to inherit over the older boy even though the older boy was legally recognized as Abraham's heir. (If you want review these events as related in the Old Testament, please click here, and use "Abraham" as your search keyword. You will need to use your "back" button to return to this page.) As a legal problem, it's impossible for either side to see any justice on the other side, and attempts to resolve differences on this basis end up in angry arguments just as often happens when siblings fall to arguing over matters of inheritance..
If you would like to print the text of this page, click here to obtain non-graphics version.
Even if such legal wrangling over ancient Biblical laws of inheritance does not carry much weight in the modern world, the religious differences between the two sides complicate matters in very practical ways. The mostly Islamic Arabs claim some of the same holy places as the mostly Jewish Israelis. Here's an example: in 2000, Ariel Sharon visited the site of the original Temple at Jerusalem -- a very holy place to the Jews and for different reasons a very holy place to the Moslems. Seeing their dedicated enemy Ariel Sharon at such a sensitive place inflamed the Palestinians. Rioting broke out among the Arabs in the neighborhood because that same site is also considered to be the spot where Mohammed ascended into Heaven at the end of his life. Dozens were seriously injured in the rioting. In other words, as long as Jews take their religious heritage seriously and as long as Moslems take their religious heritage seriously. . . well, the conclusion is obvious. Religious differences that come from claiming the same holy places are part of the reason why there is not much hope of solving the Israeli-Palestinian problem.
Also under the heading of religious reasons is the fact that there has always been some degree of anti-Semitism in the world at large; and that means that no matter what the Israeli Jews suffer and no matter how justified their reactions to attacks on them, they will still be seen by anti-Semitic people as the "bad guys." There is also anti-Islamic prejudice in the world at large. Anti-Islamic people will always see the Muslim Palestinians as the "bad guys." The result is that both sides at one time or another are demonized by many people in the world at large. As a Syrian-American who grew up near the Golan Heights told me recently, "Both the Palestinians and the Israelis have dipped their arms up to the elbows in the blood of innocents. It is really time for peace, not the deadly violence preached by the politicians, the generals, and the clergy on both sides." As you can see, it is psychologically easier for the prejudiced people of the world to say "a plague on both your houses" than it is to take meaningful steps toward resolving the problems of that chaotic part of the world. (Back to Site Guide)
There are also historical reasons why it appears unlikely that a long-term peaceful solution can be found. But we obviously cannot summarize the entire story, so quite arbitrarily I have decided to begin the story about the time that World War One ended. By then there were Jews scattered all over the world who held Zionist beliefs, that is, they believed that Palestine should be a Jewish state. A tiny trickle of these Zionists found their way to Palestine and began to agitate for an independent Jewish nation. Naturally their Arab neighbors were uncomfortable with these new arrivals.
As World War One ended, England found itself responsible for administering the Palestinian territory. It was called the Palestinian Mandate, but that area is roughly the same area that we know as Israel today. About 80 percent of the population of Palestine around 1920 were the Arabs who called themselves Palestinians; somewhat less than 20 percent of the people were Jews. Although they hated each other and had frequent violent clashes, both the Palestinians and the Jews wanted the British to leave..
But the British rulers did not want the population to be unbalanced. That only made it more tempting for Arabs to try to attack the Jewish minority. So around 1920, a British politician named Lord Balfour published a declaration inviting Jews from all over the world to come to Palestine and establish a homeland there. At first, not many Jews took advantage of this invitation; only the most extreme Zionists continued to trickle into the country. European and American Jews were living comfortable life styles in their adopted countries and so had little incentive to immigrate to a harsh land like Palestine. The Jews who wanted to come to Palestine were mostly small settlements of Jews scattered about the Islamic world in such places as Jordan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and so forth. But these Jews from the Arab countries were not allowed to leave. Arab leaders did not want a large number of Jews congregating in Palestine. The Arab leaders believed quite correctly that the more the Jewish population grew, the more trouble there would be for Palestinian Arabs who themselves wanted to possess the whole nation of Palestine.
Nevertheless, by one means or another, a steady stream of Jews came into Palestine (especially after World War Two when there were thousands of Jewish refugees from Europe seeking a new life). By 1947 the Jewish population had come to be about 40 percent of Palestine. It was inevitable that the two rival groups inside Palestine would continue to feel mutually threatened, to harden their hearts against one another, to attack each other verbally, to build up secret supplies of small arms and ammunition, and to conduct terrorist attacks on their rivals. Only the presence of the British in Palestine prevented a full-scale civil war between these two groups..
But the British did leave after World War Two. And now thousands of Jews began to make their way into Palestine as the new United Nations tried to decide what to do with Palestine. In 1947 fighting broke out between the two factions, and the UN finally decided in 1948 to partition Palestine into two states -- a Palestinian Arab area on the west bank of the Jordan river and a little strip of land along the southern Mediterranean coast were designated as Palestinian territory, and the rest of Palestine was designated as Jewish territory. (See map above.) Obviously neither the Jews nor the Palestinians were satisfied with receiving only part of Palestine as a place to establish their new nations. (By the way, it is a common misunderstanding that all of Palestine was given to the Jews by the UN.) (Back to Site Guide)
So we have reviewed some religious reasons and some historical reasons why the conflict is so hard to resolve. But equally important is the intense personal hatred that exists between the leaders of the two factions. Ariel Sharon, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Arafat, the head of the Palestinians, have been personal, mortal enemies for over 50 years. Now in their early 70's, they have been fighting each other since they were both teen-agers back in the late 1940's. And, while it is tempting to believe that the removal of one or both of these two old guys might be a step towards peace, the fact remains that there are so many other reasons for strife between the two sides that there is almost sure to be continued trouble no matter who leads either side.
Sharon has been responsible for a number of assassination attempts against Arafat, and Arafat has been responsible for a number of assassination attempts on Sharon. Each man thinks the other is a terrorist murderer of children and other innocent civilians. Arafat, for example, blames Sharon for the massacre of about 600 Palestinians in Lebanon during the early 1980's, and Arafat has not forgotten that Sharon was the commander of Unit 101 during the 1950's. Unit 101 was an Israeli secret commando group that conducted terrorist type raids in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank during the early years of the new Israeli state. Obviously Sharon has the same low opinion of Arafat. Sharon knows Arafat as the founder of Al-Fatah, one of the most dangerous Palestinian terrorist groups, and as the head of the PLO, the umbrella under which several terrorist groups have collected. The chances of these two men having a meaningful discussion about peace is practically non-existent. (Back to Site Guide)
Past and present religious and historical differences as well as the Sharon-Arafat clash of purposes and wills are all factors in why the Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues, but there are even other problems that lie in the future. One problem in this region of the world is fresh water for both agriculture and for human consumption. As the population of the area increases over the next few decades, water may become more valuable than oil, and the ability to control the fresh water supply may turn out to be a more effective weapon in this ongoing struggle than atomic bombs. Another problem that lies ahead is that outside forces have always exploited or meddled in the troubles in Palestine for their own purposes. Osama Bin Laden, for example, claims that he acts in sympathy with and on the behalf of his Palestinian brothers while in actual fact he and most other Arab leaders have never tried to help the Palestinians in meaningful ways. Or, to look at another example, consider that the U.S. frequently applies pressure on Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians in order to scale down the violence. (This seems very strange to the Israelis who have seen our own war against terrorism and who think that they are fighting the same kind of war against terrorism.) At various points Russia, England, and France have all also tried to manipulate the situation. (Don't forget that it was France who helped Israel develop the technology that led to Israel developing atomic weapons.) Most recently (May 6, 2002), the U.S. has insisted that Israel accept Yasser Arafat as the person with whom they must negotiate. Just as outsiders have gummed up the works in the past, it seems unavoidable that outsiders will continue to interfere in ways that are not always helpful. Also we can count on Israeli distrust of the Arabs to continue on indefinitely because of the Arab tradition of verbal deception when negotiating. Indeed, Arabs themselves tell stories about the advantages and disadvantages that grow out of this cultural trait. (See "The Imaginary Oranges" below.) So, as crazy as it is for these people to continue to slaughter one another, it seems they will continue to do so even though they risk destruction along with their enemies. As I said earlier, perhaps the only hope we have for solving this conflict is direct Divine intervention. (Back to Site Guide)
I realize that these remarks are extremely pessimistic. So I have turned my attention to trying to see a reason for hope. Frankly, I don't think that I can do any better than to merely list the pre-conditions that might lead to a hopeful outcome in the conflict.
First, I think, we need to pray for some sort of Divine intervention. After all, human attempts have been failing miserably for centuries. But, according to the old idea that God helps those who help themselves, here are some steps that I believe would help matters greatly:
Arafat must be replaced by a leader who is committed to educating the Palestinian people. There are no more than 30 percent of the Palestinians who are even literate. I know that my faith in education is a result of 40 years spent as a teacher, but I am convinced that an educated Palestinian populace would be far less likely to accept martyrdom as a desirable goal in life. Fewer illiterates would mean fewer suicide bombers, fewer people who could be manipulated by the Arafats of the world, fewer people who are caught up by the Arab tendency to use verbal deception as a bargaining technique, and more people who are able to see that there are two sides to the conflict.
Next, the Israelis must abandon the practice of electing former generals as prime minister. Generals generally (forgive the pun!) believe that intractable problems can be solved by breaking things and killing people. But, as we can see, that condition is difficult to achieve because nearly every adult Israeli is a military veteran and nearly every major political figure is proud of having served as a high-ranking military officer.
Somehow the Palestinians must be brought into the 21st Century. Everyone in that part of the world needs to be involved in "making the desert bloom." Ideally, what I would like to see is Palestinians being trained as engineers and scientists and to see those new technical people working on problems like improving the water supply and building an economic infrastructure for the West Bank and Gaza.
And are there any signs that such preconditions may may be met? Well, there is a growing "peacenik" movement in Israel, and there are certain to be new leaders of the factions soon. Sharon and Arafat are old men. Also there is a growing awareness that the water supply problem needs serious attention since the principal source of fresh water for human consumption is the Sea of Gallilee, a body of water is rapidly approaching a critical degree of pollution.
In any event, both sides must abandon the notion that there can never be a Palestinian and an Israeli state living side by side. No matter what they might prefer, neither side will ever see the other completely disappear. They are stuck with one another, and that means they must learn to live with one another's differing cultures and religions. There is no feasible solution to the territorial problem that will put enough distance between the two factions to make it possible for them to continue to hate one another. No matter what happens, Palestinians and Israelis will be living in close proximity to one another. And, as much as some of us on the outside would like it, there is no realistic chance that any outside power will try to nuke either or both of the factions out of existence.And then there is this one last source of hope. Remember the tale of the scorpion and the crocodile? Its moral is that common sense and logic have nothing to do with how things work in the Middle East. Well, even though all the evidence, all the common sense, and all the logic may point against a hopeful solution to this conflict, it is still the Middle East where no one can ever confidently predict what might happen tomorrow.(Back to Text Guide)
If you would like to print the text of this page, click here to obtain non-graphics version.
